The 2026 Students’ Representative Council (SRC) election process at Enchi College of Education has entered a constitutional phase following a petition filed before the SRC Judicial Council by General Secretary aspirant Emmanuel Ntim Dankwah.
The petition, dated 2nd August 2026, seeks a review of the Electoral Commission’s decision to disqualify the aspirant after the vetting process. Rather than treating the matter as a controversy, it presents an opportunity for the college community to better understand the constitutional mechanisms available for resolving electoral disputes peacefully and lawfully.
According to the petition, Mr. Dankwah participated in the official vetting exercise and obtained a score of 71%. He argues that this score exceeded the Electoral Commission’s published benchmark of 70% for the office of General Secretary, as stated in the Commission’s official notice on vetting requirements.
Despite attaining a score above the stated benchmark, the petition states that the aspirant was not recommended to contest the election. Before approaching the Judicial Council, he first submitted a petition to the SRC Electoral Commission requesting the detailed reasons for the decision, citing provisions of the SRC Constitution that provide candidates with the right to seek written explanations.
While awaiting a response from the Electoral Commission, Mr. Dankwah subsequently filed a petition before the Judicial Council, requesting an expedited hearing because of the constitutional timelines governing election disputes and the proximity of the elections.
In the petition, the aspirant asks the Judicial Council to determine whether the disqualification was consistent with the provisions of the SRC Constitution. Among the reliefs sought are:
- A declaration on the legality of the disqualification.
- An order directing the Electoral Commission to reinstate his candidature if the disqualification is found to be unconstitutional.
- An order requiring the Electoral Commission to provide the written reasons for the decision.
- An expedited hearing in view of the election timetable.
At the time of filing the petition, no determination had yet been made by the Judicial Council, and the Electoral Commission’s formal response process remained ongoing.
Understanding the Role of the Judicial Council
Student leadership elections are governed by the SRC Constitution, which establishes institutions responsible for ensuring fairness and accountability throughout the electoral process.
The Electoral Commission is mandated to organize elections, conduct vetting, and administer the electoral process. The Judicial Council, on the other hand, serves as the constitutional body responsible for interpreting the SRC Constitution and determining disputes arising from elections.
The filing of a petition before the Judicial Council does not imply wrongdoing by any institution or individual. Rather, it is one of the constitutional mechanisms designed to ensure that disagreements are resolved through due process instead of public confrontation.
A Lesson in Constitutional Advocacy
The ongoing matter highlights an important aspect of democratic governance within student leadership. Where an aspirant believes that a constitutional right has been affected, the appropriate response is to rely on the procedures established by the Constitution.
Peacefully petitioning the relevant constitutional body demonstrates respect for institutional processes and reinforces the rule of law within the student community. Regardless of the eventual outcome, such processes contribute to transparency, accountability, and confidence in student governance.
Students are therefore encouraged to familiarize themselves with the SRC Constitution, understand their rights and responsibilities, and pursue any grievances through the appropriate legal and constitutional channels.
As of the publication of this report, the matter remains pending before the SRC Judicial Council, and ENCHICOE TV will continue to monitor developments and provide balanced updates as official decisions are announced.
This report is based on the petition submitted to the SRC Judicial Council. The allegations and constitutional arguments contained in the petition represent the position of the petitioner. ENCHICOE TV recognizes that the Electoral Commission and all parties involved are entitled to due process, and any determination rests solely with the Judicial Council under the SRC Constitution.
By:
Rexford Ameyaw
Level 200-JHS Education
